4.4 Article

Further contributions to the dynamics of a freely rotating elliptical particle in shear flow

Journal

CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ENGINEERING
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages 1359-1373

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cjce.24313

Keywords

drag; elliptical cylinder; immersed boundary method; shear flow; torque

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigates the dynamic response of a neutrally buoyant elliptical cylinder in shear flow, revealing two distinct responses and discussing the transition between them through the prediction of a critical Reynolds number. The findings validate the effectiveness of the SDFIBM method for particles subjected to shear flows.
In this study, the dynamic response of a neutrally buoyant elliptical cylinder is investigated for a two-dimensional shear flow over a wide range of aspect ratios (rb=ra, where, ra and rb are the major and minor axis radii, respectively). Parametric studies were carried out for confinement ratios (k 1/4 2ra=H) that vary the distance between the particle and the domain walls (H) for shearrate (G) based Reynolds number (Re 1/4 r(2)aG.f =mu f ) : The simulations were performed using the signed distance field-immersed boundary method (SDFIBM) algorithm implemented in OpenFOAM. The motion of the particle is limited to free rotation about the z axis through the centroid without any translational freedom. This work demonstrates and affirms two distinct responses of the elliptical particle in shear flow: (1) a periodical rotating stage that exhibits a relaxation type of response and (2) a spontaneously locked stationary stage, where the net torque becomes zero. A critical Reynolds number (Recr) demarcates the transition between these two stages, and it depends on aspect ratio and confinement ratio. The prediction of Recr was found to be in excellent agreement with the experimentally reported data in the literature, validating the SDFIBM for particles subjected to shear flows.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available