4.7 Review

Pharmacological treatment of migraine: Drug classes, mechanisms of action, clinical trials and new treatments

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF PHARMACOLOGY
Volume 178, Issue 23, Pages 4588-4607

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bph.15657

Keywords

CGRP; clinical trials; migraine; migraine acute treatment; migraine chronic treatment; 5-HT

Funding

  1. Svenska Lakaresallskapet [SLS-935235]
  2. Novo Nordisk Fonden [0063805]
  3. Hjarnfonden [2019-01066]
  4. Vetenskapsradet [2013-02892]
  5. Swedish Research Council [2013-02892] Funding Source: Swedish Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Migraine is a prevalent disease globally and limited therapy response requires individually adjusted treatment. The pharmaceutical development for acute and chronic migraine has significantly intensified in recent years, with an expansion of drug targets and increased number of clinical trials.
Migraine is the sixth most prevalent disease globally, a major cause of disability, and it imposes an enormous personal and socio-economic burden. Migraine treatment is often limited by insufficient therapy response, leading to the need for individually adjusted treatment. In this review, we analyse historical and current pharmaceutical development approaches in acute and chronic migraine based on a comprehensive and systematic analysis of Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved drugs and those under investigation. The development of migraine therapeutics has significantly intensified during the last 3 years, as shown by our analysis of the trends of drug development between 1970 and 2020. The spectrum of drug targets has expanded considerably, which has been accompanied by an increase in the number of specialised clinical trials. This review highlights the mechanistic implications of FDA-approved and currently investigated drugs and discusses current and future therapeutic options based on identified drug classes of interest.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available