4.4 Review

Ketogenic diets, physical activity and body composition: a review

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 127, Issue 12, Pages 1898-1920

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S0007114521002609

Keywords

Body composition; Fat-free mass; Fat mass; Resistance training; Endurance training; Obesity; Ketogenic diet

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This review discusses the effects of ketogenic diets (KD) on body weight reduction and body composition improvements in individuals with obesity and athletes. It found that KD can reduce body weight and body fat by suppressing appetite and reducing energy intake. However, in isoenergetic situations, KD does not have superior benefits compared to non-KD. For individuals with obesity, KD seems to preserve fat-free mass (FFM) as well as low-fat diets, while in resistance-trained individuals, KD may cause FFM loss. In contrast, KD is more efficient in preserving FFM in endurance-trained individuals.
Obesity remains a serious relevant public health concern throughout the world despite related countermeasures being well understood (i.e. mainly physical activity and an adjusted diet). Among different nutritional approaches, there is a growing interest in ketogenic diets (KD) to manipulate body mass (BM) and to enhance fat mass loss. KD reduce the daily amount of carbohydrate intake drastically. This results in increased fatty acid utilisation, leading to an increase in blood ketone bodies (acetoacetate, 3-beta-hydroxybutyrate and acetone) and therefore metabolic ketosis. For many years, nutritional intervention studies have focused on reducing dietary fat with little or conflicting positive results over the long term. Moreover, current nutritional guidelines for athletes propose carbohydrate-based diets to augment muscular adaptations. This review discusses the physiological basis of KD and their effects on BM reduction and body composition improvements in sedentary individuals combined with different types of exercise (resistance training or endurance training) in individuals with obesity and athletes. Ultimately, we discuss the strengths and the weaknesses of these nutritional interventions together with precautionary measures that should be observed in both individuals with obesity and athletic populations. A literature search from 1921 to April 2021 using Medline, Google Scholar, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Sportdiscus Databases was used to identify relevant studies. In summary, based on the current evidence, KD are an efficient method to reduce BM and body fat in both individuals with obesity and athletes. However, these positive impacts are mainly because of the appetite suppressive effects of KD, which can decrease daily energy intake. Therefore, KD do not have any superior benefits to non-KD in BM and body fat loss in individuals with obesity and athletic populations in an isoenergetic situation. In sedentary individuals with obesity, it seems that fat-free mass (FFM) changes appear to be as great, if not greater, than decreases following a low-fat diet. In terms of lean mass, it seems that following a KD can cause FFM loss in resistance-trained individuals. In contrast, the FFM-preserving effects of KD are more efficient in endurance-trained compared with resistance-trained individuals.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available