4.6 Article

Comparison of venous thromboembolism incidence in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients receiving bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (RVD) or carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRD) with aspirin or rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF HAEMATOLOGY
Volume 196, Issue 1, Pages 105-109

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjh.17772

Keywords

multiple myeloma; thrombosis; anticoagulation; myeloma therapy; haematological oncology

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The incidence of venous thromboembolism varies across different regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma patients, with higher rates seen in those treated with KRD induction. The use of low-dose rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis can mitigate this risk without an observable increase in bleeding rates.
Incidence of venous thromboembolism (VTE) varies across different regimens in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients. Limited data exist on the use of direct oral anticoagulants as thromboprophylaxis in the setting of haematologic malignancies, specifically multiple myeloma. In this retrospective study of 305 NDMM patients, VTE rates in those treated with carfilzomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (KRD) + aspirin (ASA), bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone (RVD) + ASA, and KRD + rivaroxaban were statistically significant, 16 center dot 1%, 4 center dot 8%, and 4 center dot 8%, respectively. The findings confirm a higher incidence of VTE when using KRD induction compared to RVD induction and reveal that the use of low-dose rivaroxaban thromboprophylaxis can mitigate this risk without an observable increase in bleeding rates.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available