4.6 Article

Estimating personal solar ultraviolet radiation exposure through time spent outdoors, ambient levels and modelling approaches

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF DERMATOLOGY
Volume 186, Issue 2, Pages 266-273

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/bjd.20703

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. European Commission Framework Program 7 [227020]
  2. Juan de la Cierva fellowship [FJCI-2017-33842]
  3. Ramon y Cajal fellowship [RYC-2012-10995]
  4. Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness
  5. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation through the 'Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa [CEX2018-000806-S]
  6. Generalitat de Catalunya through the CERCA Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study findings suggest that time spent outdoors and a modelling approach are reliable predictors of individual UVR exposure levels, while ambient UVR levels are a poor predictor. Personal UVR exposure levels were significantly higher in summer and among outdoor workers.
Background Evidence on validation of surrogates applied to evaluate the personal exposure levels of solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) in epidemiological studies is scarce. Objectives To determine and compare the validity of three approaches, including (i) ambient UVR levels, (ii) time spent outdoors and (iii) a modelling approach integrating the aforementioned parameters, to estimate personal UVR exposure over a period of 6 months among indoor and outdoor workers and in different seasons (summer/winter). Methods This validation study was part of the European Commission-funded ICEPURE project and was performed between July 2010 and January 2011 in a convenience sample of indoor and outdoor workers in Catalunya, Spain. We developed linear regression models to quantify the variation in the objectively measured personal UVR exposure that could be explained, separately, by the ambient UVR, time spent outdoors and modelled UVR levels. Results Our 39 participants - mostly male and with a median age of 35 years - presented a median daily objectively measured UVR of 0 center dot 37 standard erythemal doses. The UVR dose was statistically significantly higher in summer and for outdoor workers. The modelled personal UVR exposure and self-reported time spent outdoors could reasonably predict the variation in the objectively measured personal UVR levels (R-2 range 0 center dot 75-0 center dot 79), whereas ambient UVR was a poor predictor (R-2 = 0 center dot 21). No notable differences were found between seasons or occupation. Conclusions Time outdoors and our modelling approach were reliable predictors and of value to be applied in epidemiological studies of the health effects of current exposure to UVR.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available