4.7 Article

New clinical and biological insights from the international TARGIT-A randomised trial of targeted intraoperative radiotherapy during lumpectomy for breast cancer

Journal

BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
Volume 125, Issue 3, Pages 380-389

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1038/s41416-021-01440-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University College London Hospitals (UCLH)/UCL Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre
  2. UCLH Charities
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme
  4. Ninewells Cancer Campaign
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council
  6. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [FKZ 01ZP0508]
  7. Cancer Research UK

Ask authors/readers for more resources

TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups with a good prognosis for local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT. Non-breast cancer mortality is significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm.
BACKGROUND: The TARGIT-A trial reported risk-adapted targeted intraoperative radiotherapy (TARGIT-IORT) during lumpectomy for breast cancer to be as effective as whole-breast external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). Here, we present further detailed analyses. METHODS: In total, 2298 women (>= 45 years, invasive ductal carcinoma <= 3.5 cm, cN0-N1) were randomised. We investigated the impact of tumour size, grade, ER, PgR, HER2 and lymph node status on local recurrence-free survival, and of local recurrence on distant relapse and mortality. We analysed the predictive factors for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT as part of the risk-adapted approach, using regression modelling. Non-breast cancer mortality was compared between TARGIT-IORT plus EBRT vs. EBRT. RESULTS: Local recurrence-free survival was no different between TARGIT-IORT and EBRT, in every tumour subgroup. Unlike in the EBRT arm, local recurrence in the TARGIT-IORT arm was not a predictor of a higher risk of distant relapse or death. Our new predictive tool for recommending supplemental EBRT after TARGIT-IORT is at . Non-breast cancer mortality was significantly lower in the TARGIT-IORT arm, even when patients received supplemental EBRT, HR 0.38 (95% CI 0.17-0.88) P = 0.0091. CONCLUSION: TARGIT-IORT is as effective as EBRT in all subgroups. Local recurrence after TARGIT-IORT, unlike after EBRT, has a good prognosis. TARGIT-IORT might have a beneficial abscopal effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available