4.5 Review

Systematic review and meta-analysis of febrile neutropenia risk with TCH(P) in HER2-positive breast cancer

Journal

BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT
Volume 190, Issue 3, Pages 357-372

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-021-06387-1

Keywords

Febrile neutropenia; Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor; Neoadjuvant therapy; Breast neoplasms; Docetaxel; Carboplatin

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis found that the crude FN risk associated with (neo)adjuvant TCH(P) is over 20%, recommending primary prophylaxis with G-CSF to reduce FN risk effectively. No significant differences in risk were observed between TCH and TCHP in the included studies, and age did not seem to significantly impact FN risk.
Background Docetaxel, carboplatin and trastuzumab, with or without pertuzumab (TCH(P)), has become the preferred (neo)adjuvant regimen for HER2-positive breast cancer. However, its associated febrile neutropenia (FN) risk is unclear: pivotal studies reported FN risks < 10%, but in clinical practice, a high FN rate (> 20%) was observed. This systematic review and meta-analysis determine the FN risk associated with TCH(P) and the indication for primary prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (PP G-CSF). Methods The MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane databases were searched for full-text English articles reporting the FN incidence in early breast cancer patients receiving (neo)adjuvant TCH(P). The primary endpoint was the pooled crude FN incidence in patients treated without PP G-CSF using the random effects method. Secondary endpoints were the FN risk with PP G-CSF support, age-related differences in FN and differences in risk with TCH versus TCHP. Results Seventeen studies were included in the systematic review. The pooled estimates of FN incidences were 27.6% (95% CI 18.6 to 37.1) in patients who did not receive PP G-CSF (primary meta-analysis, 9 studies, n = 889) versus 5.0% (95% CI 2.6 to 8.0) in patients administered PP G-CSF (secondary meta-analysis, 7 studies, n = 445). Two studies reported non-significant age-related differences in FN. The risk comparison between TCH and TCHP was inconclusive. Conclusions The crude FN risk associated with (neo)adjuvant TCH(P) is over 20%, the upper limit above which the international guidelines unanimously advise PP G-CSF administration. G-CSF prophylaxis effectively reduces FN risk and should become the standard of care with (neo)adjuvant TCH(P).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available