4.6 Article

Day-to-day variability in motor threshold during rTMS treatment for depression: Clinical implications

Journal

BRAIN STIMULATION
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 1118-1125

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.brs.2021.07.013

Keywords

Transcranial magnetic stimulation; Resting motor threshold; Variability; Depression

Funding

  1. Fundacao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia (FCT
  2. Portugal) [SFRH/BD/130210/2017]
  3. FCT (Portugal)
  4. Harvard Medical School e Portugal Program [HMSP-ICJ/0020/2011]
  5. FCT/MCTES [PTDC/MED-NEU/31331/2017, PTDC/MED-NEU/30302/2017]
  6. FEDER
  7. Janssen-Cilag, Ltd
  8. Schuhfried GmBH
  9. Compass Pathways, Ltd [2017-003288-36, 2020-00134825]
  10. Janssen-Cilag, Ltd [2019-002992-33]
  11. Linus Health and TI Solutions AG

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study evaluated the daily variability of motor threshold in the treatment of depression using repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and found that this variability has a significant impact on treatment intensity. Regular assessments of motor threshold, either daily or weekly, are recommended to improve the effectiveness and safety of therapeutic rTMS practice.
Background: When repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is used to treat medication refractory depression, the treatment pulse intensity is individualized according to motor threshold (MT). This measure is often acquired only on the first day of treatment, as per the protocol currently approved by Food and Drug Administration. Objective: Here, we aimed to assess daily MT variability across an rTMS treatment course and simulate the effects of different schedules of MT assessment on treatment intensity. Methods: We conducted a naturalistic retrospective study with 374 patients from a therapeutic rTMS program for depression that measures MT daily. Results: For each patient, in almost half the TMS sessions, MT varied on average more than 5% as compared to the baseline MT acquired in the first treatment day. Such variability was only minimally impacted by having different TMS technicians acquiring MT in different days. In a smaller cohort of healthy individuals, we confirmed that the motor hotspot localization method, a critical step for accurate MT assessment, was stable in different days, arguing that daily MT variability reflects physiological variability, rather than an artifact of measurement error. Finally, in simulations of the effect of one-time MT measurement, we found that half of sessions would have been 5% or more above or below target intensity, with almost 5% of sessions 25% above target intensity. The simulated effects of weekly MT measurements were significantly improved. Conclusions: In conclusion, MT varies significantly across days, not fully dependent on methods of MT acquisition. This finding may have important implications for therapeutic rTMS practice regarding safety and suggests that regular MT assessments, daily or at least weekly, would ameliorate the effect. (c) 2021 Published by Elsevier Inc. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http:// creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available