4.4 Article

Changes in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography, neuron-specific enolase, and S100B in neonates with brain injury induced by neonatal hyperbilirubinemia and their significance

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 943-948

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1931449

Keywords

Amplitude-integrated electroencephalography; NSE; S100B; neonatal hyperbilirubinemia; brain injury

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that brain injury induced by neonatal hyperbilirubinemia significantly affected the amplitude-integrated electroencephalography results, as well as increased levels of neuron-specific enolase and S100B. The combination of aEEG, NSE, and S100B showed good diagnostic value in diagnosing brain injury and predicting prognosis.
Objective: To explore the changes in amplitude-integrated electroencephalography (aEEG), neuron-specific enolase (NSE), and S100B in neonates with brain injury induced by neonatal hyperbilirubinemia (NHB). Methods: 67 neonates with brain injury induced by NHB admitted to our hospital from March 2016 to October 2018 were included in a brain injury group (BIG), and 82 neonates with NHB but without brain injury in our hospital during the same period were included in a non-BIG. The two groups were compared regarding the rates of normal and abnormal aEEG results. Results: The proportion of normal aEEG results in the BIG was significantly lower than that in the non-BIG, and the proportion of moderately and severely abnormal aEEG results in the BIG were both significantly higher than those in the non-BIG. The BIG showed significantly higher NSE and S100B levels than those of the non-BIG. The ROC curve for predicting prognosis showed that the AUC of aEEG, NSE, S100B, and the combined detection are 0.780, 0.754, 0.743, 0.788. The AUC > 0.700 indicated a good predictive value for the prognosis. Conclusion: The combination of aEEG, NSE, and S100B has good value in diagnosing injury induced by NHB and can predict prognosis moderately well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available