4.4 Article

Menopause, anti-Mullerian hormone and cognition in a cohort of women with persistent symptoms following TBI: a case for future research

Journal

BRAIN INJURY
Volume 35, Issue 8, Pages 934-942

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/02699052.2021.1929487

Keywords

TBI; hormones; menopause; cognition; distress; long-term outcomes

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CWG-126580]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated AMH levels in women following TBI and their relation to menstrual cycle, cognition, distress, and symptoms of menopause. Findings included lower-than-expected AMH levels in 50% of participants and new onset of menstrual changes in 50% of participants. Women over 35 exhibited lower cognitive scores, and menopause-related symptoms were reported across all age groups.
Objectives: Primary: To explore anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) levels in community dwelling women following TBI. Secondary: To explore the relation of AMH to menstrual cycle, cognition, distress and symptoms of menopause. Setting: Large adult TBI outpatient clinic in Toronto Canada. Research design: Prospective study of 10 women with persistent symptoms who were one or more years post TBI. Methods: Consenting participants provided a serum sample for AMH levels, and completed the Menopause Rating Scale (MRS), Symptom Checklist-90 r (SCL-90 r), Repeatable Battery for the Assessment of Neurological Status (RBANS) and a health questionnaire. Main outcomes and results: This study found lower than expected levels of AMH in 50% of participants relative to age matched norms and 50% of participants experienced new onset of menstrual changes. Also notable were findings of lower-than-expected cognitive scores in women over 35 and reports of menopause-related symptoms across all ages groups. Conclusions: As our understanding of the role of AMH grows, examining changes in this novel biomarker in the long-term post-TBI is warranted. Future research should be sufficiently powered to expand on and validate the study's findings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available