4.6 Article

Capability, opportunity, and motivation: an across contexts empirical examination of the COM-B model

Journal

BMC PUBLIC HEALTH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12889-021-11019-w

Keywords

Diet; Eating; Intervention; Model; Nutrition; Overweight; Obesity; Physical activity; Theory; Weight gain

Funding

  1. Commonwealth Government of Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study empirically examined the utility of the COM-B model in intervention planning for young adults' eating and physical activity behaviors. The findings identified barriers and enablers for these behaviors, supporting the potential for future intervention design based on the COM-B model. Further research is needed to validate these findings across different populations and settings.
BackgroundThere is limited evidence for successful weight gain prevention interventions targeting young adults. Developing effective interventions necessitates a theoretical model that can identify barriers and enablers for healthy eating and physical activity among young adults to support weight management. This study empirically examines the utility of the COM-B model as a framework for intervention planning across two behavioural contexts: eating and physical activity.MethodsA cross-sectional survey research design was employed to empirically test the COM-B model in the contexts of young adult's eating and physical activity behaviours. Informed by the Theoretical Domains Framework, pre-validated measures appropriate for capturing the latency of the COM (Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation) constructs were sourced. Both surveys (eating and physical activity) were administered online to two independent samples of young adults aged 18-35years. Models were specified and tested using structural equation modelling.ResultsA total of 582 (mean age=22.8years; 80.3% female) and 455 (mean age=24.9years; 80.8% female) participants were included in the physical activity and eating analyses, respectively. The COM-B model explained 31% of variance in physical activity behaviour and 23% of variance in eating behaviour. In the physical activity model (N=582), capability and opportunity were found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. In the eating model (N=455), capability was found to be associated with behaviour through the mediating effect of motivation. Capability was also found to mediate the association between opportunity and motivation. Consistencies and variations were observed across both models in terms of COM indicators.ConclusionsFindings support the COM-B model's explanatory potential in the context of young adult's physical activity and eating behaviours. Barriers and enablers underlying young adult's physical activity and eating behaviours were identified that represent potential targets for future intervention design. Further research is needed to validate present study findings across different populations and settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available