4.5 Article

An emm-type specific qPCR to track bacterial load during experimental human Streptococcus pyogenes pharyngitis

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06173-w

Keywords

Pharyngitis; Human challenge study; qPCR; Nucleic acid extraction; Streptococcus pyogenes

Funding

  1. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [GNT1099183]
  2. Belgian Kids' Fund for Pediatric Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A reliable molecular method has been developed for measuring Streptococcus pyogenes bacterial load from throat swabs collected in a controlled human infection model of S. pyogenes pharyngitis.
Background: Streptococcus pyogenes causes a profound global burden of morbidity and mortality across its diverse clinical spectrum. To support a new controlled human infection ('challenge') model seeking to accelerate S. pyogenes vaccine development, we aimed to develop an accurate and reliable molecular method for quantifying bacterial load from pharyngeal swabs collected during experimental human pharyngitis. Methods: Combined sequential RNA + DNA extraction from throat swabs was compared to traditional separate RNA-only and DNA-only extractions. An emm-type specific qPCR was developed to detect the emm75 challenge strain. Results from the qPCR were compared to culture, using throat swab samples collected in a human challenge study. Results: The qPCR was 100% specific for the emm75 challenge strain when tested against a panel of S. pyogenes emm-types and other respiratory pathogens. Combined RNA + DNA extraction had similar yield to traditional separate extractions. The combined extraction method and emm75 qPCR had 98.8% sensitivity compared to culture for throat swabs collected from challenge study participants. Conclusions: We have developed a reliable molecular method for measuring S. pyogenes bacterial load from throat swabs collected in a controlled human infection model of S. pyogenes pharyngitis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available