4.5 Article

Impact of the Covid-19 epidemic and related social distancing regulations on social contact and SARS-CoV-2 transmission potential in rural South Africa: analysis of repeated cross-sectional surveys

Journal

BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06604-8

Keywords

COVID-19; Contact survey; Reproduction number; Social contacts; Indoor

Funding

  1. UK Economic and Social Research Council [ES/P008011/1]
  2. UK Medical Research Council (MRC)
  3. UK Department for International Development (DFID) under the MRC/DFID Concordat agreement
  4. European Union [MR/P002404/1]
  5. Africa Health Research Institute (AHRI)
  6. Wellcome Trust [201433/Z/16/Z, 210479/Z/18/Z, 218261/Z/19/Z]
  7. Royal Society
  8. UK ESRC [ES/P008011/1]
  9. NIH [R01-AI147321]
  10. EDTCP [RIA208D-2505B]
  11. UK MRC [CCF17-7779]
  12. BMGF [OPP1084276, OPP1135288, INV-001754]
  13. WHO [2020/985800-0]
  14. ESRC [ES/P008011/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  15. MRC [MR/P002404/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

After South Africa implemented strict social distancing regulations, social contacts in rural areas decreased significantly, especially in other people's homes and public spaces. Older adults had fewer interactions with those over 50, but their interactions with 15-29 year olds remained relatively stable.
Background South Africa implemented rapid and strict physical distancing regulations to minimize SARS-CoV-2 epidemic spread. Evidence on the impact of such measures on interpersonal contact in rural and lower-income settings is limited. Methods We compared population-representative social contact surveys conducted in the same rural KwaZulu-Natal location once in 2019 and twice in mid-2020. Respondents reported characteristics of physical and conversational ('close interaction') contacts over 24 hours. We built age-mixing matrices and estimated the proportional change in the SARS-CoV-2 reproduction number (R-0). Respondents also reported counts of others present at locations visited and transport used, from which we evaluated change in potential exposure to airborne infection due to shared indoor space ('shared air'). Results Respondents in March-December 2019 (n = 1704) reported a mean of 7.4 close interaction contacts and 196 shared air person-hours beyond their homes. Respondents in June-July 2020 (n = 216), as the epidemic peaked locally, reported 4.1 close interaction contacts and 21 shared air person-hours outside their home, with significant declines in others' homes and public spaces. Adults aged over 50 had fewer close contacts with others over 50, but little change in contact with 15-29 year olds, reflecting ongoing contact within multigenerational households. We estimate potential R-0 fell by 42% (95% plausible range 14-59%) between 2019 and June-July 2020. Conclusions Extra-household social contact fell substantially following imposition of Covid-19 distancing regulations in rural South Africa. Ongoing contact within intergenerational households highlighted a potential limitation of social distancing measures in protecting older adults.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available