4.4 Article

Health system gaps in cardiovascular disease prevention and management in Nepal

Journal

BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12913-021-06681-0

Keywords

Health system performance; CVDs; Nepal; Health system building blocks

Funding

  1. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U24HL136789]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that less than 10% of the Nepalese population is covered by national health insurance, with over 50% of health spending being out of pocket. Efficiency of CVD prevention and management programs in Nepal is hindered by human resource shortages, weak monitoring, and stakeholder engagement.
BackgroundCardiovascular diseases (CVDs) are the leading cause of deaths and disability in Nepal. Health systems can improve CVD health outcomes even in resource-limited settings by directing efforts to meet critical system gaps. This study aimed to identify Nepal's health systems gaps to prevent and manage CVDs.MethodsWe formed a task force composed of the government and non-government representatives and assessed health system performance across six building blocks: governance, service delivery, human resources, medical products, information system, and financing in terms of equity, access, coverage, efficiency, quality, safety and sustainability. We reviewed 125 national health policies, plans, strategies, guidelines, reports and websites and conducted 52 key informant interviews. We grouped notes from desk review and transcripts' codes into equity, access, coverage, efficiency, quality, safety and sustainability of the health system.ResultsNational health insurance covers less than 10% of the population; and more than 50% of the health spending is out of pocket. The efficiency of CVDs prevention and management programs in Nepal is affected by the shortage of human resources, weak monitoring and supervision, and inadequate engagement of stakeholders. There are policies and strategies in place to ensure quality of care, however their implementation and supervision is weak. The total budget on health has been increasing over the past five years. However, the funding on CVDs is negligible.ConclusionGovernments at the federal, provincial and local levels should prioritize CVDs care and partner with non-government organizations to improve preventive and curative CVDs services.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available