4.7 Article

Genetic analysis of three maize husk traits by QTL mapping in a maize-teosinte population

Journal

BMC GENOMICS
Volume 22, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-021-07723-x

Keywords

Maize; Teosinte; Husk; QTL

Funding

  1. Key Laboratory Biology and Genetic Improvement of Maize in Northeast Region, Ministry of Agriculture, China [CXGC2018KFKT001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study identified QTL associated with husk traits in maize and teosinte, revealing genetic relationships between husk length, width, and layers, which provide clues for exploring candidate genes regulating husk growth.
Background The maize husk consists of numerous leafy layers and plays vital roles in protecting the ear from pathogen infection and dehydration. Teosinte, the wild ancestor of maize, has about three layers of small husk outer covering the ear. Although several quantitative trait loci (QTL) underlying husk morphology variation have been reported, the genetic basis of husk traits between teosinte and maize remains unclear. Results A linkage population including 191 BC2F8 inbred lines generated from the maize line Mo17 and the teosinte line X26-4 was used to identify QTL associated with three husk traits: i.e., husk length (HL), husk width (HW) and the number of husk layers (HN). The best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) depicted wide phenotypic variation and high heritability of all three traits. The HL exhibited greater correlation with HW than HN. A total of 4 QTLs were identified including 1, 1, 2, which are associated with HL, HW and HN, respectively. The proportion of phenotypic variation explained by these QTLs was 9.6, 8.9 and 8.1% for HL, HN and HW, respectively. Conclusions The QTLs identified in this study will pave a path to explore candidate genes regulating husk growth and development, and benefit the molecular breeding program based on molecular marker-assisted selection to cultivate maize varieties with an ideal husk morphology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available