4.6 Article

Local treatment for triple-negative breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy: breast-conserving surgery or total mastectomy?

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08429-9

Keywords

Triple negative breast cancer; Breast-conserving surgery; Total mastectomy; Radiotherapy; SEER

Categories

Funding

  1. Key Research and Development Program of Shaanxi [2019SF-100]
  2. Bureau of Xi'an Science and Technology [201805098YX6SF32(1)]
  3. Clinical Research Award of the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University [XJTU1AFCRF-2019-023]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study found that for TNBC patients, the survival benefit of breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy was higher than or similar to that of total mastectomy.
BackgroundBecause there is no exact therapeutic target, the systemic treatment of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) still relies on chemotherapy. In terms of local treatment, based on the highly malignant characteristics of TNBC, it is still uncertain whether patients should be given more aggressive local treatment.MethodsThis study was based on the SEER database. 13,262 TNBC patients undergoing chemotherapy were included. According to local treatment methods, patients were divided into breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy (BCS+RT), total mastectomy alone and total mastectomy with radiotherapy (Mastectomy+RT). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis drew the survival curves of Overall Survival (OS) and Breast Cancer Specific Survival (BCSS), and Cox proportional risk regression models were used to analyze the impact of different local treatments on OS and BCSS.ResultsAfter adjusting confounding factors, Mastectomy alone group (HR=1.57; 95%CI: 1.40-1.77) and Mastectomy+RT group (HR=1.28; 95%CI: 1.12-1.46) were worse in OS than BCS+RT group, and Mastectomy+RT group (HR=0.81; 95%CI: 0.73-0.91) was better in OS than Mastectomy alone group. The effect of local treatment for BCSS was similar to that of OS. After stratification according to age, tumor size and lymph node status, when the age was less than 55years old, at T4, N2 or N3 category, there was no statistical significance between the BCS+RT group and the Mastectomy+RT group in OS or BCSS (all P>0.05). When the age was less than 65years old, at T1, T2 or N0 category, there was no statistical significance between the Mastectomy alone group and the Mastectomy+RT group in OS or BCSS (all P>0.05). The results of other stratified analyses were basically consistent with the results of total population analysis.ConclusionThe survival benefit of breast-conserving surgery with radiotherapy was higher than or similar to that of total mastectomy TNBC patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available