4.6 Article

The mechanisms of colorectal cancer cell mesenchymal-epithelial transition induced by hepatocyte exosome-derived miR-203a-3p

Journal

BMC CANCER
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-08419-x

Keywords

miR-203a-3p; Exosome; Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition; Colorectal cancer

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81871981, 81702902, 8170111484]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2019A1515010646]
  3. Medical Scientific Research Foundation of Guangdong Province of China [A2018319]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MiR-203a-3p derived from hepatocyte exosomes plays a crucial role in promoting E-cadherin expression and inhibiting Src activity in colorectal cancer cells, leading to reduced invasion rate.
BackgroundLiver metastasis is the most common cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). Phosphatase of regenerating liver-3 induces CRC metastasis by epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, which promotes CRC cell liver metastasis. Mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET), the opposite of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition, has been proposed as a mechanism for the establishment of metastatic neoplasms. However, the molecular mechanism of MET remains unclear.MethodsUsing Immunohistochemistry, western blotting, invasion assays, real-time quantitative PCR, chromatin immunoprecipitation, luciferase reporter assays, human miRNA arrays, and xenograft mouse model, we determined the role of hepatocyte exosome-derived miR-203a-3p in CRC MET.ResultsIn our study, we found that miR-203a-3p derived from hepatocyte exosomes increased colorectal cancer cells E-cadherin expression, inhibited Src expression, and reduced activity. In this way miR-203a-3p induced the decreased invasion rate of CRC cells.CoclusionMiR-203a-3p derived from hepatocyte exosomes plays an important role of CRC cells to colonize in liver.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available