Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.What are the costs of stillbirth? Capturing the direct health care and macroeconomic costs in Australia
Emily J. Callander et al.
BIRTH-ISSUES IN PERINATAL CARE (2020)
Health resource utilization of labor induction versus expectant management
William A. Grobman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Variations in use of childbirth interventions in 13 high-income countries: A multinational cross-sectional study
Anna E. Seijmonsbergen-Schermers et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2020)
Maternal and Neonatal Hospitalization Costs Associated With Elective Induction of Labor at Term in California, 2007–2011
Alyssa R. Hersh et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Cost of Elective Labor Induction Compared With Expectant Management in Nulliparous Women
Brett D. Einerson et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2020)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks or expectant management until 42 weeks: A systematic review and an individual participant data meta-analysis of randomised trials
Marten Alkmark et al.
PLOS MEDICINE (2020)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management until 42 weeks (INDEX): multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial
Judit K. J. Keulen et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Induction of labour at 41 weeks versus expectant management and induction of labour at 42 weeks (SWEdish Post-term Induction Study, SWEPIS): multicentre, open label, randomised, superiority trial
Ulla-Britt Wennerholm et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2019)
Discounting in Economic Evaluations
Arthur E. Attema et al.
PHARMACOECONOMICS (2018)
Labor Induction versus Expectant Management in Low-Risk Nulliparous Women
William A. Grobman et al.
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE (2018)
Labour induction near term for women aged 35 or over: an economic evaluation
K. F. Walker et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2017)
Quantifying over-estimation in early stopped clinical trials and the freezing effect on subsequent research
Hao Wang et al.
CLINICAL TRIALS (2016)
Recommendations for Conduct, Methodological Practices, and Reporting of Cost-effectiveness Analyses Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine
Gillian D. Sanders et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2016)
Stillbirths: economic and psychosocial consequences
Alexander E. P. Heazell et al.
LANCET (2016)
Does induction of labour increase the risk of caesarean section? A systematic review and meta-analysis of trials in women with intact membranes
S. Wood et al.
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY (2014)
Use of labour induction and risk of cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Ekaterina Mishanina et al.
CANADIAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION JOURNAL (2014)
Problems of stopping trials early
Gordon H. Guyatt et al.
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL (2012)
Cost-effectiveness of elective induction of labor at 41 weeks in nulliparous women
Anjali J. Kaimal et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2011)
Bias and Trials Stopped Early for Benefit
Scott M. Berry et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
Stopping Randomized Trials Early for Benefit and Estimation of Treatment Effects Systematic Review and Meta-regression Analysis
Dirk Bassler et al.
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION (2010)
Systematic reviews are not biased by results from trials stopped early for benefit
Steven N. Goodman
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2008)
Stopping at nothing? Some dilemmas of data monitoring in clinical trials
Steven N. Goodman
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE (2007)
Complications of term pregnancies beyond 37 weeks of gestation
AB Caughey et al.
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2004)
Elective induction: An analysis of economic and health consequences
KE Kaufman et al.
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY (2002)
EQ-5D: a measure of health status from the EuroQol Group
R Rabin et al.
ANNALS OF MEDICINE (2001)
Share Paper
