4.5 Article

Reproductive potential and instability of the rDNA region of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast: Common or separate mechanisms of regulation?

Journal

EXPERIMENTAL GERONTOLOGY
Volume 84, Issue -, Pages 29-39

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exger.2016.08.009

Keywords

Aging; ERCs; rDNA; Hypertrophy; Lifespan; Yeast; Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Funding

  1. Polish National Science Centre [DEC-2013/09/B/NZ3/01352]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae is a unicellular organism commonly used as a model to explain mechanisms of aging in multicellular organisms. It is used as a model organism for both replicative and chronological aging. Replicative aging is defined as the number of daughter cells produced by an individual cell during its life. A widely accepted hypothesis assumes that replicative aging of yeast is related to the existence of a so called senescence factor that gradually accumulates in the mother cell, which consequently leads to its death. One of the earliest proposed senescence factors were extrachromosomal rDNA circles (ERCs). However, their role in the regulation of the replicative lifespan is somewhat controversial and subject to discussion. In this paper, we propose a more comprehensive approach to this problem by analysing the length of life and the correlation between the cell size and the replicative lifespan of yeast cells with different level of ERCs, i.e Delta rad52 and Delta sgs1 mutants. This analysis shows that it is not the accumulation of ERCs but genomic instability and hypertrophy that play an important role in the regulation of reproductive potential and total lifespan of the S. cerevisiae yeast. However, these two factors have a different impact on various phases of the yeast cell life, i.e. reproductive and post-reproductive phases. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available