4.8 Article

Life cycle water footprint assessment of syngas production from biomass chemical looping gasification

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 342, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125940

Keywords

Life cycle assessment; Water footprint; Syngas; Biomass chemical looping gasification; Oxygen carrier

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2020M672225]
  2. Research Project of Science and Technology of the Henan Province [202102310565]
  3. Science Foundation of Hebei Normal University [L2021034]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The research focuses on the life cycle water footprint of producing syngas through chemical looping gasification of corn straw and wheat straw, showing that crop growth stage and different allocation methods significantly impact total water consumption. Sensitivity analysis suggests that water consumption of crop yield and growth can have opposite effects on water consumption efficiency.
Water is crucial for biofuel production. It is important to study the influence of biofuel technology on water resource for the development of biofuel. Life cycle water footprint for the syngas production via chemical looping gasification of corn straw and wheat straw is developed in this paper. The results show that the total water consumption of syngas production via corn straw and wheat straw chemical looping gasification are 1139.84 and 2170.41 L H2O/m(3) syngas, respectively. The total water consumption of the aforementioned approaches is both dominated by crop growth stage. Additionally, different allocation methods have significant impact on the total water consumption. Sensitivity analysis demonstrates that water consumption of crop yield and crop growth can have an almost same but opposite impact on water consumption efficiency. Based on the results, guidance can be provided for crop straw to syngas via chemical looping gasification to lower water use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available