4.8 Article

Synergistic effect of the cotton stalk and high-ash coal on gas production during co-pyrolysis/gasification

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 336, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125336

Keywords

Cotton stalk; High-ash coal; Co-pyrolysis; Co-gasification; Synergetic effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that the synergistic effect between cotton stalk and high-ash coal in copyrolysis/gasification processes can be enhanced by heating to 950 degrees Celsius to increase gas production. There is a linear relationship between the gas yield during copyrolysis and the mixing ratio of cotton stalk, indicating almost no interaction between the two. The addition of steam can enhance the catalytic effect of alkali metals and alkaline earth metals in cotton stalk during cogasification, while the synergistic effect is reduced as the blending ratio of cotton stalk increases.
The synergistic effect of the cotton stalk (CS) and the high-ash coal (HAC) on the gas production in the copyrolysis/gasification processes was studied using the newly designed quartz boat in this work. The gas yield and the concentrations of main gas components were quantitatively compared between the co-pyrolysis/ gasification and the individual pyrolysis/gasification. The results showed that the gas yield during the copyrolysis was promoted at 950 degrees C. There was almost no interaction between CS and HAC, since the copyrolytic gas yield exhibited a linear relationship with CS mixing ratio of 20% to 60%. The catalytic effect of alkali metals and alkaline earth metals that existed in CS, was enhanced by the addition of steam, and the synergistic effect was reduced while gas yield was enhanced with CS blending ratio increasing during cogasification. The results provided a method to enhance synergistic effect between biomass and coal during copyrolysis/gasification in this study.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available