4.8 Article

Characteristics of anammox granular sludge using color differentiation, and nitrogen removal performance of its immobilized fillers based on microbial succession

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 333, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.125188

Keywords

Anammox bacteria; Granular sludge color; Immobilized filler; Microbial community structure; Nitrogen removal

Funding

  1. Beijing Municipal Commission of Education [Z161100004516015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that red AnGS had higher biomass content, EPS, and activity compared to brown AnGS, with red AnGS exhibiting nitrification and brown AnGS exhibiting denitrification. Immobilization improved the contribution rate of Anammox and involved different regulatory mechanisms.
The characteristics of anammox granular sludge (AnGS) based on color differentiation, and the regulation mechanism of immobilized fillers in the system were investigated. The results showed that biomass content, EPS and activity of red AnGS (R1) were higher than those of brown AnGS (R2). Moreover, R1 showed nitrification, while R2 showed denitrification. Filamentous bacteria constituted the granule skeleton of R1, while R2 mainly constituted inorganic nucleation and granulation. Additionally, immobilization improved the contribution rate of Anammox, and involved different regulatory mechanisms. High-throughput sequencing analysis showed that R1 encapsulation biomass eliminated miscellaneous bacteria and established specific flora, while mixed encapsulated biomass of R1 and R2 re-formed a functional bacterial network, which strengthened interspecies cooperation. The R2 encapsulated biomass and AnAOB copy numbers were inferior and the interspecific cooperation was weak, resulting in an unsatisfactory nitrogen removal performance. These results can strengthen the understanding and optimization of AnGS and its immobilization system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available