4.8 Article

Particle swarm optimization and global sensitivity analysis for catalytic co-pyrolysis of Chlorella vulgaris and plastic waste mixtures

Journal

BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY
Volume 329, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124874

Keywords

Co-pyrolysis; Microalgae Chlorella vulgaris; High-density polyethylene waste; Kinetics; Particle swarm optimization; Thermodynamic

Funding

  1. Ministry of High Education Malaysia through HICOE award
  2. EPSRC [EP/P034667/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study investigated the co-pyrolysis of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and HDPE waste mixtures using three different catalysts and conducted global sensitivity analysis and thermodynamic analysis. The results showed that the addition of catalysts reduced the activation energy, with the bi-functional LS/HZSM-5 catalyst exhibiting the best performance.
This study investigated on the co-pyrolysis of microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and high-density polyethylene (HDPE) waste mixtures which was performed with three types of catalysts, namely limestone (LS), HZSM-5 zeolite, and novel bi-functional LS/HZSM-5/LS. Kissinger-Kai (K-K) model-free method was coupled with Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) model-fitting method using the thermogravimetric experimental data. A global sensitivity analysis was carried out using Latin Hypercube Sampling and rank transformation to assess the extent of impact of the input kinetic parameters on the output results. Furthermore, a thermodynamic analysis was performed to obtain parameters such as enthalpy change (?H), Gibb?s free energy (?G), and entropy change (?S). The activation energy (EA) of the microalgae Chlorella vulgaris and HDPE binary mixture were found to be lower upon the addition of catalysts. Among the catalyst used, bi-functional LS/HZSM-5 catalyst exhibited the lowest EA (83.59 kJ/mol) and ?H (78 kJ/mol) as compared to LS and HZSM-5 catalysts.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available