4.5 Article

Improvement of cordycepin production by an isolated Paecilomyces hepiali mutant from combinatorial mutation breeding and medium screening

Journal

BIOPROCESS AND BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING
Volume 44, Issue 11, Pages 2387-2398

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00449-021-02611-w

Keywords

Cordycepin; Co-60-gamma ray irradiation; Paecilomyces hepiali; Medium screening; Response surface methodology

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [32070099, 32000898]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province [LQ21B060006]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Provincial Universities of Zhejiang [RF-C2019005]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study successfully increased the yield of cordycepin through strain modification and medium screening, resulting in a high-yield mutant strain P. hepiali ZJB18001, which offers new possibilities for the industrial production of cordycepin.
Cordycepin is a major bioactive compound found in Cordyceps sinensis that exhibits a broad spectrum of biological activities. Here a Paecilomyces hepiali OR-1 strain was initially isolated from plateau soil for the bioproduction of cordycepin. Subsequently, strain modification including Co-60 gamma-ray and ultraviolet irradiation were employed to increase the cordycepin titer, resulted in a high-yield mutant strain P. hepiali ZJB18001 with the cordycepin content of 0.61 mg/g(DCW), showing a 2.3-fold to that from the wild strain (0.26 mg/g(DCW)). Furthermore, medium screening based on Box-Behnken design and the response surface methodology facilitated the enhancement of cordycepin yield to the value of 0.96 mg/g(DCW) at 25 degrees C for 5 days in submerged cultivation with an optimized medium composition. The high cordycepin yield, rapid growth rate and stable genetic characteristics of P. hepiali ZJB18001 are beneficial in terms of costs and time for the industrialization of cordycepin production.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available