4.1 Article

Comparative in silico prediction of P-glycoprotein-mediated transport for 2010-2020 US FDA-approved drugs using six Web-tools

Journal

BIOPHARMACEUTICS & DRUG DISPOSITION
Volume 42, Issue 8, Pages 393-398

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/bdd.2299

Keywords

in silico methods; P-glycoprotein; performance value; substrate; Web-tool

Funding

  1. Region Bretagne

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the performance of six freely accessible Web-tools in predicting P-gp-mediated transport using a test set of 231 marketed drugs approved by the FDA from 2010 to 2020. The results showed that the predictions of P-gp substrate status by these online in silico methods may not meet the criteria commonly required for acceptable prediction, whether used alone or in combination. Therefore, caution should be exercised when considering predictions made by these tools.
P-glycoprotein (P-gp) is an efflux pump implicated in pharmacokinetics and drug-drug interactions. The identification of its substrates is consequently an important issue, notably for drugs under development. For such a purpose, various in silico methods have been developed, but their relevance remains to be fully established. The present study was designed to get insight about this point, through determining the performance values of six freely accessible Web-tools (ADMETlab, AdmetSAR2.0, PgpRules, pkCSM, SwissADME and vNN-ADMET), computationally predicting P-gp-mediated transport. Using an external test set of 231 marketed drugs, approved over the 2010-2020 period by the US Food and Drug Administration and fully in vitro characterized for their P-gp substrate status, various performance parameters (including sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, Matthews correlation coefficient and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) were determined. They were found to rather poorly meet criteria commonly required for acceptable prediction, whatever the Web-tools were used alone or in combination. Predictions of being P-gp substrate or non-substrate by these online in silico methods may therefore be considered with caution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available