4.7 Article

In quest of small-molecules as potent non-competitive inhibitors against influenza

Journal

BIOORGANIC CHEMISTRY
Volume 114, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.bioorg.2021.105139

Keywords

430-cavity; Neuraminidase; Non-competitive inhibition; Influenza

Funding

  1. Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) , New Delhi, India [58/36/2013-BMS]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A series of scaffolds were designed and synthesized as potential anti-influenza agents, with some molecules demonstrating high antiviral activity and neuraminidase inhibitory activity, as well as cell-protective properties.
A series of scaffolds namely aurones, 3-indolinones, 4-quinolones and cinnamic acid-piperazine hybrids, was designed, synthesized and investigated in vitro against influenza A/H1N1pdm09 virus. Designed molecules adopted different binding mode i.e., in 430-cavity of neuraminidase, unlike sialic acid and oseltamivir in molecular docking studies. All molecules reduced the viral titer and exhibited non-cytotoxicity along with cryoprotective property towards MDCK cells. Molecules (Z)-2-(3 '-Chloro-benzylidene)-1,2-dihydro-indol-3-one (2f), (Z)-2-(4 '-Chloro-benzylidene)-1,2-dihydro-indol-3-one (2g) and 2-(2 '-Methoxy-phenyl)-1H-quinolin-4-one (3a) were the most interesting molecules identified in this research, endowed with robust potencies showing lownanomolar EC50 values of 4.0 nM, 6.7 nM and 4.9 nM, respectively, compared to reference competitive and non-competitive inhibitors: oseltamivir (EC50 = 12.7 nM) and quercetin (EC50 = 0.56 mu M), respectively. Besides, 2f, 2g and 3a exhibited good neuraminidase inhibitory activity in sub-micromolar range (IC50 = 0.52 mu M, 3.5 mu M, 1.3 mu M respectively). Moreover, these molecules were determined as non-competitive inhibitors similar to reference non-competitive inhibitor quercetin unlike reference competitive inhibitor oseltamivir in kinetics studies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available