4.7 Review

Advances in the applications of polymer biomaterials for in vitro follicle culture

Journal

BIOMEDICINE & PHARMACOTHERAPY
Volume 140, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2021.111422

Keywords

Follicle; In vitro culture; Biomaterials; Artificial ovary

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Innovation Incubation Fund of Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University [ZNJC201923]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This article discusses the gradual decrease in ovarian reserve with age, the related diseases that may occur after the loss of estrogen protection postmenopausally, as well as the controversy surrounding PHRT and AO technology. The article also compares the advantages and disadvantages of different polymer biomaterials for use in follicle IVC, providing a theoretical basis for the development of mature AO technology.
The ovarian reserve (OR) indicates ovarian function by representing the quantity and quality of ovarian follicles, and it gradually decreases with increasing age. With the prolongation of women's lives, the protection provided by estrogen is lost for decades in postmenopausal women, and the related cardiovascular and cerebrovascular diseases, osteoporosis, and decreased immunity are the main risk factors affecting women's quality of life and longevity. Pharmacologic hormone replacement therapy (PHRT) has been controversial, and the construction of artificial ovary (AO) has attracted increasing attention. The most critical step of AO generation is the establishment of an in vitro culture (IVC) system to support the development of isolated follicles. This article mainly compares the advantages and disadvantages of different polymer biomaterials for use in follicle IVC, provides theoretical support for the development and construction of the follicle IVC system using natural biological materials, and provides a theoretical basis for establishing mature AO technology.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available