4.7 Article

A fast data-driven method for genotype imputation, phasing and local ancestry inference: Mendellmpute.jl

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 37, Issue 24, Pages 4756-4763

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab489

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [R01-HG009120, T32-HG002536, R01-HG006139, R01-GM053275, R35GM141798]
  2. NSF [DMS-2054253]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A novel data-mining method for genotype imputation and phasing was introduced, utilizing efficient linear algebra routines for calculations and delivering similar prediction accuracy with better memory usage and faster run-times compared to existing methods. The method operates on both dosage data and unphased genotype data, imputing missing genotypes and phasing untyped SNPs simultaneously.
Motivation: Current methods for genotype imputation and phasing exploit the volume of data in haplotype reference panels and rely on hidden Markov models (HMMs). Existing programs all have essentially the same imputation accuracy, are computationally intensive and generally require prephasing the typed markers. Results: We introduce a novel data-mining method for genotype imputation and phasing that substitutes highly efficient linear algebra routines for HMM calculations. This strategy, embodied in our Julia program Mendellmpute.jl, avoids explicit assumptions about recombination and population structure while delivering similar prediction accuracy, better memory usage and an order of magnitude or better run-times compared to the fastest competing method. Mendellmpute operates on both dosage data and unphased genotype data and simultaneously imputes missing genotypes and phase at both the typed and untyped SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms). Finally, Mendellmpute naturally extends to global and local ancestry estimation and lends itself to new strategies for data compression and hence faster data transport and sharing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available