4.7 Article

Toward comprehensive functional analysis of gene lists weighted by gene essentiality scores

Journal

BIOINFORMATICS
Volume 37, Issue 23, Pages 4399-4404

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btab475

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key RD Program [2020YFC2004704]
  2. PKU-Baidu Fund [2019BD014]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of China [62025102/81970440/81921001]
  4. Peking University Basic Research Program [BMU2020JC001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The weighted gene set enrichment algorithm and online tool WEAT was proposed, which weights genes using essentiality scores. Its usefulness was confirmed through three case studies, suggesting that it could provide more possibilities for further exploring the functions of given gene lists.
Motivation: Gene functional enrichment analysis represents one of the most popular bioinformatics methods for annotating the pathways and function categories of a given gene list. Current algorithms for enrichment computation such as Fisher's exact test and hypergeometric test totally depend on the category count numbers of the gene list and one gene set. In this case, whatever the genes are, they were treated equally. However, actually genes show different scores in their essentiality in a gene list and in a gene set. It is thus hypothesized that the essentiality scores could be important and should be considered in gene functional analysis. Results: For this purpose, here, we proposed weighted enrichment analysis tool (WEAT) (https://www.cuilab.cn/weat/), a weighted gene set enrichment algorithm and online tool by weighting genes using essentiality scores. We confirmed the usefulness of WEAT using three case studies, the functional analysis of one aging-related gene list, one gene list involved in Lung Squamous Cell Carcinoma and one cardiomyopathy gene list from Drosophila model. Finally, we believe that the WEAT method and tool could provide more possibilities for further exploring the functions of given gene lists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available