4.4 Article

Analysis of Tagged Proteins Using Tandem Affinity-Buffer Exchange Chromatography Online with Native Mass Spectrometry

Journal

BIOCHEMISTRY
Volume 60, Issue 24, Pages 1876-1884

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.biochem.1c00138

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [P41 GM128577, GM120582, AI116119, AI140541]
  2. Ohio Eminent Scholar funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Protein overexpression and purification are critical for in vitro studies, but can be challenging for some proteins. A new liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry method can help analyze target proteins in cell lysates. This approach may be valuable for optimizing large-scale protein production for structural biology and biotherapeutic research.
Protein overexpression and purification are critical for in vitro structure-function characterization studies. However, some proteins are difficult to express in heterologous systems due to host-related (e.g., codon usage, translation rate) and/or proteinspecific (e.g., toxicity, aggregation) challenges. Therefore, it is often necessary to test multiple overexpression and purification conditions to maximize the yield of functional protein, particularly for resource-heavy downstream applications (e.g., biocatalysts, tertiary structure determination, biotherapeutics). Here, we describe an automatable liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry-based method for direct analysis of target proteins in cell lysates. This approach is facilitated by coupling immobilized metal affinity chromatography (IMAC), which leverages engineered poly-histidine tags in proteins of interest, with size exclusion-based online buffer exchange (OBE) and native mass spectrometry (nMS). While we illustrate a proof of concept here using relatively straightforward examples, the use of IMAC-OBE-nMS to optimize conditions for large-scale protein production may become invaluable for expediting structural biology and biotherapeutic initiatives.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available