4.6 Article

Effect of chronically electric foot shock stress on spatial memory and hippocampal blood brain barrier permeability

Journal

BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH
Volume 410, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbr.2021.113364

Keywords

Electric foot shock stress; Blood brain barrier; Permeability; Spatial learning and memory; Anxiety-like behavior; Hippocampus

Funding

  1. Shiraz University of Medical Sciences and Health Services, Shiraz, Iran [97017418202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stress can increase locomotor activities, impair spatial learning and memory, and lead to a significant increase in hippocampal BBB permeability.
Maintaining blood-brain barrier (BBB) contributes critically to preserving normal brain functions. According to the available evidence, intense or chronic exposure to stress would potentially affect different brain structures, such as the hippocampus, negatively. The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the BBB permeability of the hippocampus and the performance of spatial learning and memory under chronically electric foot shock stress. Sixteen rats were divided into the control and stress groups equally. Animals in the stress group were exposed to foot shock (1 mA, 1 Hz) for 10-s duration every 60 s (1 h/day) for 10 consecutive days. The anxiety-related behavior, spatial learning, and memory were assessed by an Open Field (OF) and the Morris Water Maze (MWM) respectively. The hippocampal BBB permeability was determined by Evans blue penetration assay. Our results demonstrated that the stress model not only increased locomotor activities in the OF test but reduced spatial learning and memory in MWM. Moreover, these effects coincided with a significant increase in hippocampal BBB permeability. In sum, the stress model can be used in future studies focusing on the relationship between stress and BBB permeability of the hippocampus.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available