4.0 Article

Psychosocial and lifestyle predictors of distress and well-being in people with mental illness during the COVID-19 pandemic

Journal

AUSTRALASIAN PSYCHIATRY
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 617-624

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.1177/10398562211025040

Keywords

Social determinants; lifestyle behaviours; pandemic; mental health

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study found that social support decreased, alcohol intake increased, and sleep quality and diet worsened among people with mental illness during the pandemic, leading to psychological distress. Psychological distress was associated with having two or more mental illnesses, and was negatively associated with having a physical disease. Better diet seemed to protect against increases in distress, while loneliness hindered improvements in well-being.
Objectives: People with mental illness may be vulnerable to psychological distress and reduced well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. The aim of this study was to assess psychosocial and lifestyle predictors of distress and well-being in people with mental illness during the pandemic. Method: People with mental illness who participated in an exercise programme prior to the pandemic were invited to complete surveys about mental health and lifestyle corresponding to before and during the pandemic. Results: Social support reduced, alcohol intake increased, and sleep quality and diet worsened during the pandemic, contributing to distress. Psychological distress was associated with the two or more mental illnesses, and negatively associated with having a physical disease. Better diet appeared to protect against increases in distress; loneliness hindered improvements in well-being. Conclusions: Healthy lifestyle programmes designed to improve social connection may improve health for people with mental illnesses during and after the COVID-19 pandemic.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available