4.7 Article

A Deeper Look at DES Dwarf Galaxy Candidates: Grus I and Indus II

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 916, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0443

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Texas AM University
  2. George P. and Cynthia Woods Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy
  3. NSF [AST-1813881, AST-1412792]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy
  5. U.S. National Science Foundation
  6. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  7. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  8. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  9. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  10. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  11. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  12. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  13. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  14. FundacAo Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  15. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  16. Ministerio da Ciencia, Tecnologia e InovacAo
  17. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  18. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766, AST-1536171]
  19. MINECO [AYA2015-71825, ESP2015-66861, FPA2015-68048, SEV-2016-0588, SEV-2016-0597, MDM-2015-0509]
  20. ERDF funds from the European Union
  21. CERCA program of the Generalitat de Catalunya
  22. European Research Council under the European Union [240672, 291329, 306478]
  23. Brazilian Instituto Nacional de Ciencia e Tecnologia (INCT) e-Universe (CNPq) [465376/2014-2]
  24. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-AC02-07CH11359]
  25. Argonne National Laboratory
  26. University of California at Santa Cruz
  27. University of Cambridge
  28. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  29. University of Chicago
  30. University College London
  31. DES-Brazil Consortium
  32. University of Edinburgh
  33. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  34. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  35. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  36. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  37. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  38. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  39. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat Munchen
  40. University of Michigan
  41. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  42. University of Nottingham
  43. Ohio State University
  44. University of Pennsylvania
  45. University of Portsmouth
  46. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory
  47. Stanford University
  48. University of Sussex
  49. OzDES Membership Consortium

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents deep g- and r-band Magellan/Megacam photometry of two dwarf galaxy candidates, Grus I and Indus II. Grus I is found to be an old, metal-poor dwarf galaxy, with updated distance and structural parameters. However, Indus II is likely a false positive detection due to chance alignment of stars along the line of sight.
We present deep g- and r-band Magellan/Megacam photometry of two dwarf galaxy candidates discovered in the Dark Energy Survey (DES), Grus I and Indus II (DES J2038-4609). For the case of Grus I, we resolved the main sequence turn-off (MSTO) and similar to 2 mags below it. The MSTO can be seen at g(0) similar to 24 with a photometric uncertainty of 0.03 mag. We show Grus I to be consistent with an old, metal-poor (similar to 13.3 Gyr, [Fe/H] similar to -1.9) dwarf galaxy. We derive updated distance and structural parameters for Grus I using this deep, uniform, wide-field data set. We find an azimuthally-averaged halflight radius more than two times larger (similar to 151(-31)(+21) pc; similar to 4'. 16(-0.74)(+0.54)) and an absolute V-band magnitude similar to-4.1 that is similar to 1 magnitude brighter than previous studies. We obtain updated distance, ellipticity, and centroid parameters that are in agreement with other studies within uncertainties. Although our photometry of Indus II is similar to 2-3 magnitudes deeper than the DES Y1 public release, we find no coherent stellar population at its reported location. The original detection was located in an incomplete region of sky in the DES Y2Q1 data set and was flagged due to potential blue horizontal branch member stars. The best-fit isochrone parameters are physically inconsistent with both dwarf galaxies and globular clusters. We conclude that Indus II is likely a false positive, flagged due to a chance alignment of stars along the line of sight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available