4.7 Article

Observations of Bright Pulses from Pulsar B0031-07 at 4.82 GHz

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 918, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac0e90

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chinese National Science Foundation [U1838109, U1731238, U1831102, U1631106, 11873080]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [12041304]
  3. National SKA Program of China [2020SKA0120100]
  4. Astronomical Research Centre of the Chinese Academy of Sciences
  5. National Program on Key Research and Development Project [2016YFA0400804]
  6. Xinjiang uygur autonomous region of China
  7. Open Fund of Guizhou Provincial Key Laboratory of Radio Astronomy and Data Processing

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study reports detection of bright pulses from PSR B0031-07, revealing specific distribution patterns of peak flux density and interval times, as well as well-defined quasi-periodicities in some of the detected pulses.
We report on the detection of 146 (0.96%) bright pulses with a peak flux density >0.86 Jy from PSR B0031-07 in 4 hr of continuous observations made at 4.82 GHz, with a bandwidth of 1 GHz, using the Shanghai Tian Ma 65 m radio telescope. We find that the peak flux density distribution follows a power law with index alpha = -3.6 +/- 0.2, while the pulse energy appears to follow a logarithmic normal distribution. The bright pulses from PSR B0031-07 were observed to repeat in an irregular fashion. The intervals between bright pulses can be described with an exponentiated Weibull distribution. Furthermore, the sensitive observations at higher frequency with a short time resolution of 65.54 mu s form a reliable basis for detailed microstructure studies. Close inspection of the detected bright pulses reveals that 38 pulses exhibit well-defined quasi-periodicities. No unanimous period for the quasi-periodicities is found, and the peak flux density is independent of the micropulse width. Finally, possible physical mechanisms are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available