4.6 Article

The MUSE-Faint survey II. The dark-matter density profile of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Eridanus 2

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 651, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202040239

Keywords

dark matter; galaxies: individual: Eridanus 2; stars: kinematics and dynamics; techniques: imaging spectroscopy

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) [614.001.652]
  2. Fundacao para a Ciencia e a Tecnologia (FCT) [UID/FIS/04434/2019, UIDB/04434/2020, UIDP/04434/2020]
  3. Investigador FCT [IF/01654/2014/CP1215/CT0003]
  4. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory under programme [0100.D-0807, 0102.D-0372, 0103.D-0705, 0104.D-0199]
  5. National Science Foundation [ACI-1440620]
  6. National Aeronautics and Space Administration's Earth Science Technology Office, Computation Technologies Project [NCC5-626]
  7. Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [IF/01654/2014/CP1215/CT0003] Funding Source: FCT

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Using stellar line-of-sight velocities, the study constrained the dark matter density profile of the ultra-faint dwarf galaxy Eridanus 2, deriving constraints on self-interacting and fuzzy dark matter scenarios. The results favored cold dark matter over self-interacting dark matter, and provided evidence for fuzzy dark matter. The study also found consistency with the literature regarding the mass-to-light ratio and set limits on core and soliton sizes. The constraints on self-interaction and fuzzy-dark matter particle mass offered complementary information and challenged previous results obtained for larger dwarf galaxies.
Aims. We use stellar line-of-sight velocities to constrain the dark-matter density profile of Eridanus 2, an ultra-faint dwarf galaxy with an absolute V-band magnitude M-V = -7.1 that corresponds to a stellar mass M-* approximate to 9 x 10(4) M-circle dot. We furthermore derive constraints on fundamental properties of self-interacting and fuzzy dark matter scenarios. Methods. We present new observations of Eridanus 2 from MUSE-Faint, a survey of ultra-faint dwarf galaxies with the Multi Unit Spectroscopic Explorer on the Very Large Telescope, and determine line-of-sight velocities for stars inside the half-light radius. Combined with literature data, we have 92 stellar tracers out to twice the half-light radius. With these tracers we constrain models of cold dark matter, self-interacting dark matter, and fuzzy dark matter, using CJAM and pyGravSphere for the dynamical analysis. The models of self-interacting and fuzzy dark matter relate the density profile to the self-interaction coefficient and the dark-matter particle mass, respectively. Results. We find substantial evidence (Bayes factor similar to 10(-0.6)) for cold dark matter (a cuspy halo) over self-interacting dark matter (a cored halo) and weak evidence (Bayes factor similar to 10(-0.4)) for fuzzy dark matter over cold dark matter. We find a virial mass M-200 similar to 10(8) M-circle dot and astrophysical factors J(alpha(j)(c)) similar to 10(11 )M(circle dot)(2) kpc(-5) and D(alpha(D)(c)) similar to 10(2)-10(2.5) M-circle dot kpc(-2) (proportional to dark-matter annihilation and decay signals, respectively), the exact values of which depend on the density profile model. The mass-to-light ratio within the half-light radius is consistent with the literature. We do not resolve a core (r(c) < 47 pc, 68% confidence level) or a soliton (r(sol) < 7.2 pc, 68% confidence level). These limits are equivalent to an effective self-interaction coefficient f Gamma < 2.2 x 10(-2)(9) cm(3) s(-1) eV(-1) c(2) and a fuzzy-dark-matter particle mass m(a) > 4.0 x 10(-20) eV c(2). The constraint on self-interaction is complementary to those from gamma-ray searches. The constraint on fuzzy-dark-matter particle mass is inconsistent with those obtained for larger dwarf galaxies, suggesting that the flattened density profiles of those galaxies are not caused by fuzzy dark matter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available