4.6 Article

Zipf's law for cosmic structures: How large are the greatest structures in the universe?

Journal

ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
Volume 651, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

EDP SCIENCES S A
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141081

Keywords

cosmology: observations; large-scale structure of Universe; methods: statistical

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The statistical characterization of the distribution of visible matter in the universe is a central problem in modern cosmology. By considering the size distribution of superclusters of galaxies and leveraging the Zipf-Mandelbrot law, the study assesses the problem of how large the greatest structures in the universe are. The finding suggests that structures larger than the observed superclusters are expected to be found when deeper redshift surveys are completed.
The statistical characterization of the distribution of visible matter in the universe is a central problem in modern cosmology. In this respect, a crucial question still lacking a definitive answer concerns how large the greatest structures in the universe are. This point is closely related to whether or not such a distribution can be approximated as being homogeneous on large enough scales. Here we assess this problem by considering the size distribution of superclusters of galaxies and by leveraging the properties of Zipf-Mandelbrot law, providing a novel approach which complements the standard analysis based on the correlation functions. We find that galaxy superclusters are well described by a pure Zipf's law with no deviations and this implies that all the catalogs currently available are not sufficiently large to spot a truncation in the power-law behavior. This finding provides evidence that structures larger than the greatest superclusters already observed are expected to be found when deeper redshift surveys will be completed. As a consequence, the scale beyond which galaxy distribution crossovers toward homogeneity, if any, should increase accordingly.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available