4.6 Article

Effect of the learning curve of cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) on the treatment of colorectal peritoneal metastasis

Journal

ASIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 339-345

Publisher

ELSEVIER SINGAPORE PTE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2021.06.003

Keywords

Colorectal cancer; Cytoreductive surgery; Learning curve; Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy; Peritoneal surface malignancy

Categories

Funding

  1. NCCS Cancer Fund
  2. National Research Council Transition Award [NMRC/TA/0061/2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed that with the overcoming of the learning curve and the implementation of better patient selection methods, there has been an improvement in perioperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM).
Background: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) are increasingly utilised in the management of colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM). This combined modality is associated with a significant learning curve (LC) and is often criticised for its associated morbidity. This study aims to inspect the LC of this procedure in our institute. Methods: A retrospective review of the institution's prospectively maintained database of CRS-HIPEC cases was performed. Patients treated for CPM were stratified into two groups: Group 1 consists of patients in our initial 100 cases of CRS-HIPEC and Group 2 comprises patients treated subsequently. Perioperative prognostic factors and oncological outcomes were analysed. Results: Between 2001 and 2016, 77 patients with CPM underwent CRS-HIPEC, of which 31 patients (40.3%) were in Group 1 and 46 patients (59.7%) in Group 2. Median follow-up duration was 96 months in Group 1 and 25 months in Group 2. There were no differences in OS (35 months vs 46 months, p = 0.054) and DFS (13 months vs 14 months, p = 0.676) between the groups. There were more patients with higher PCI (>12) (57.1% vs 22.2%, p = 0.006) and high-grade complications (25.8% vs 8.7%, p = 0.045) in Group 1. Group 2 patients had a shorter hospitalisation (14 days vs 11 days, p = 0.015) and SICU stay (1 day vs 0 days, p < 0.001). Conclusion: An improvement in the perioperative outcomes after CRS-HIPEC for CPM may be partly attributed to overcoming the LC and incorporation of better patient selection methods. (c) 2021 Asian Surgical Association and Taiwan Robotic Surgery Association. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/ licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available