4.2 Review

Artificial tissue creation under microgravity conditions: Considerations and future applications

Journal

ARTIFICIAL ORGANS
Volume 45, Issue 12, Pages 1446-1455

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/aor.14017

Keywords

artificial tissues; microgravity; space; tissue engineering

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tissue engineering methods under microgravity conditions can promote cell proliferation, differentiation, and changes in cell organization, potentially encouraging the formation of more biosimilar artificial tissues with transplantation potential. However, these benefits are not consistent across all cell types, and the long-term impact of microgravity on tissue development and stability remains an unanswered question. With further research, microgravity tissue engineering may have productive clinical applications for medical and pharmaceutical purposes.
Traditional tissue engineering methods often fail to promote robust cell growth and differentiation, limiting the development of functioning tissues. However, the microgravity conditions created by rotating wall vessel bioreactors minimize shear stress and unload the gravitational force usually placed on cells. In a microgravity environment, cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and the 3D organization of cells are altered, potentially encouraging the formation of more biosimilar artificial tissues for certain cell types. Additionally, cells in these engineered tissues display lowered immunogenicity, pointing to the transplantation potential of tissues engineered in microgravity conditions. However, these benefits are not consistent across all cell types, and the long-term impact of microgravity on tissue development and stability remains an unanswered question. Even so, there is potential that with further research, microgravity tissue engineering will have productive clinical applications for medical and pharmaceutical purposes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available