4.7 Article

Cost-effectiveness analysis with unordered decisions

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN MEDICINE
Volume 117, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2021.102064

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness analysis; Decision trees; Probabilistic graphical models; Influence diagrams; Decision analysis networks

Funding

  1. Spanish Government [TIN2016-77206-R, PID2019-110686RB-I00]
  2. European Regional Development Fund
  3. Spanish Ministry of Education

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study presents a CEA method for problems with unordered or partially ordered decisions using decision analysis networks (DANs) and evaluates its computational efficiency through experiments. The evaluation of DANs returns a set of intervals for the willingness to pay, specifying the cost, effectiveness, and optimal intervention for each interval based on the willingness to pay.
Introduction: Cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) is used increasingly in medicine to determine whether the health benefit of an intervention is worth the economic cost. Decision trees, the standard decision modeling technique for non-temporal domains, can only perform CEAs for very small problems. Influence diagrams can model much larger problems, but only when the decisions are totally ordered. Objective: To develop a CEA method for problems with unordered or partially ordered decisions, such as finding the optimal sequence of tests for diagnosing a disease. Methods: We explain how to model those problems using decision analysis networks (DANs), a new type of probabilistic graphical model, somewhat similar to Bayesian networks and influence diagrams. We present an algorithm for evaluating DANs with two criteria, cost and effectiveness, and perform some experiments to study its computational efficiency. We illustrate the representation framework and the algorithm using a hypothetical example involving two therapies and several tests and then present a DAN for a real-world problem, the mediastinal staging of non-small cell lung cancer. Results: The evaluation of a DAN with two criteria, cost and effectiveness, returns a set of intervals for the willingness to pay, separated by incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). The cost, the effectiveness, and the optimal intervention are specific for each interval, i.e., they depend on the willingness to pay. Conclusion: Problems involving several unordered decisions can be modeled with DANs and evaluated in a reasonable amount of time. OpenMarkov, an open-source software tool developed by our research group, can be used to build the models and evaluate them using a graphical user interface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available