4.7 Article

What do we want from Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI)? - A stakeholder perspective on XAI and a conceptual model guiding interdisciplinary XAI research

Journal

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE
Volume 296, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2021.103473

Keywords

Explainable Artificial Intelligence; Explainability; Interpretability; Explanations; Understanding; Interdisciplinary Research; Human-Computer Interaction

Funding

  1. Volkswagen Foundation [AZ 95143, AZ 98509, AZ 98510, AZ 98511, AZ 98512, AZ 98513, AZ 98514]
  2. DFG [389792660, TRR248]
  3. ERC [695614]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper discusses the classification of stakeholders and their desires in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI), and proposes a model to explicitly explain the main concepts and relationships needed to fulfill stakeholders' desires.
Previous research in Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) suggests that a main aim of explainability approaches is to satisfy specific interests, goals, expectations, needs, and demands regarding artificial systems (we call these stakeholders' desiderata) in a variety of contexts. However, the literature on XAI is vast, spreads out across multiple largely disconnected disciplines, and it often remains unclear how explainability approaches are supposed to achieve the goal of satisfying stakeholders' desiderata. This paper discusses the main classes of stakeholders calling for explainability of artificial systems and reviews their desiderata. We provide a model that explicitly spells out the main concepts and relations necessary to consider and investigate when evaluating, adjusting, choosing, and developing explainability approaches that aim to satisfy stakeholders' desiderata. This model can serve researchers from the variety of different disciplines involved in XAI as a common ground. It emphasizes where there is interdisciplinary potential in the evaluation and the development of explainability approaches. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available