4.7 Article

Structural performance of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints with high-strength bars

Journal

Publisher

SPRINGERNATURE
DOI: 10.1007/s43452-021-00252-0

Keywords

Beam-column joint; High-strength steel bar; Coupler; Shear; Flexure; Ductility

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study evaluated the structural performance of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints with high-strength screw-type steel bars connected with couplers. The experiment showed that flexural cracks near the couplers slightly influenced initial stiffness and yielding point of longitudinal reinforcement, but did not significantly affect load-versus-drift relationship, peak load, and ductility capacity. The analytical results were similar to the experimental results.
This study evaluates the structural performance of reinforced concrete interior beam-column joints having high-strength screw-type steel bars mechanically connected with couplers. A total of six full-scale specimens were cast and subjected to repeated cyclic lateral loads. High-strength screw-type reinforcing bars, with a yield strength of 690 MPa, were used as longitudinal reinforcement of the specimens. The main test variables were designed with and without couplers and the longitudinal reinforcement ratio of the beam. The couplers were applied to the plastic hinge zones of columns and beams to maximize their impact. The experiment confirmed that the flexural cracks generated near the couplers slightly influenced the initial stiffness, the yielding point of the longitudinal reinforcement of the beams, and the displacement at peak load of the specimens. However, the load versus story drift relationship, the peak load, and the ductility capacity of the specimens were not significantly affected. In addition, the analytical results obtained using the current structural design codes and finite element analysis were similar to the experimental results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available