4.5 Article

Acceptance and adherence to chemoprevention among women at increased risk of breast cancer

Journal

BREAST
Volume 24, Issue 1, Pages 51-56

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2014.11.006

Keywords

Breast cancer; Breast cancer prevention; Lobular carcinoma in situ; Tamoxifen; Raloxifene; Chemoprevention

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Chemoprevention is an option for women who are at increased risk of breast cancer (five year risk >= 1.7%). It is uncertain, however, how often women accept and complete five years of therapy and whether clinical or demographic factors predict completion. Methods: Medical records were abstracted for 219 women whose five year risk of breast cancer was >= 1.7% and who were offered chemoprevention while attending a high risk breast clinic at the Moffitt Cancer Center. We examined the likelihood of accepting chemoprevention and completing five years of therapy, and potential clinical and demographic predictors of these outcomes, using multivariable logistic regression and survival analysis models. Results: There were 118/219 women (54.4%) who accepted a recommendation for chemoprevention and began therapy. The likelihood of accepting chemoprevention was associated with lifetime breast cancer risk and was higher for women with specific high risk conditions (lobular carcinoma in situ and atypical ductal hyperplasia). Women with osteoporosis and those that consumed alcohol were also more likely to accept medication. There were 58/118 (49.2%) women who stopped medication at least temporarily after starting therapy. Based on survival curves, an estimated 60% of women who begin chemoprevention will complete five years of therapy. Conclusions: A substantial percentage of women at increased risk of breast cancer will decline chemoprevention and among those that accept therapy, approximately 40% will not be able to complete five years of therapy because of side effects. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available