4.4 Article

Long-term coexistence between the macroalga Caulerpa prolifera and the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa in a Mediterranean lagoon

Journal

AQUATIC BOTANY
Volume 173, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.aquabot.2021.103415

Keywords

Seagrass-seaweed interactions; Macrophytes mapping; Mar menor; Coastal lagoon

Funding

  1. Biodiversity Foundation of the Spanish Ministry of Ecological Transition and Demographic Challenge
  2. Spanish Project UMBRAL - National Plan of Research of the Spanish Government [CTM2017-86695-C3-2-R]
  3. DMEMM project - Spanish Oceanography Institute
  4. program Personal Tecnico de Apoyo - Ministry of Science and Innovation
  5. Spanish NGO Asociacion de Naturalistas del Sureste
  6. [G30072540]
  7. [FBCC2017]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This study explored the potential negative influence of the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon. Through extensive field sampling and modeling, it was found that the seaweed was not the main driver of seagrass distribution and abundance in this ecosystem, and there was no overall negative relationship between the two species. Both macrophytes have coexisted for decades without the seaweed progressively replacing the seagrass.
The potential negative influence of the seaweed Caulerpa prolifera on the seagrass Cymodocea nodosa was explored in a Mediterranean coastal lagoon (Mar Menor, Spain) where the alga suddenly and rapidly spread four decades ago. An extensive field sampling was carried out across the lagoon to characterise the distribution and abundance of both macrophytes at different spatial scales, as well as sediment characteristics. Generalised linear and additive models were performed at the whole-lagoon scale, for deep and shallow bottoms, independently, to explore factors influencing C. nodosa distribution and abundance. A high-spatial-resolution macrophyte distribution map was also generated by integrating underwater imaging, direct visualisations and orthophotographs. This map showed that both macrophytes largely dominated the ecosystem but with opposing depth patterns of abundance that mainly reflected their specific light requirements. C. nodosa was dominant at shallow depths but also grew intermingled with a dense C. prolifera bed over large areas of the deep seafloor with highly anoxic muddy sediments. Models did not reveal overall negative relationships between the macrophytes, indicating that C. prolifera was not the main driver of C. nodosa distribution and abundance in this coastal lagoon. Findings highlighted the absence of a negative direct or indirect influence of C. prolifera on C. nodosa, as supported by the fact that the distributions of both macrophytes were similar to those reported in the 1980s, just a few years after C. prolifera had spread in the lagoon. We conclude, therefore, that C. prolifera is not progressively replacing C. nodosa in this ecosystem, where both species have coexisted for decades.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available