4.7 Article

Thermal and electrical performances of actively cooled concentrator photovoltaic system

Journal

APPLIED THERMAL ENGINEERING
Volume 196, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2021.117295

Keywords

CPV/T; Double-layer microchannel heat sink; Header; Cell performance

Funding

  1. Science and Technology Development Fund [33515]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the impact of considering the headers in a double-layer microchannel heat sink coupled with concentrator photovoltaic systems, demonstrating the importance of including the header section in the numerical model for more accurate temperature profiles.
The double-layer microchannel heat sink (DL-MCHS) is commonly applied for thermal management of high heat flux surfaces, including electronic chips and concentrator photovoltaic (CPV). However, most of the recent studies neglected the header effect in the simulation of the DL-MCHS. The current study compressively investigated the impact of considering the inlet and outlet headers on the CPV systems' performance. A three-dimensional conjugate heat transfer model of the fluid flow in the DL-MCHS coupled with the CPV layers' thermal model was employed. The thermal performances of DL-MCHS with and without considering the headers were evaluated. Parallel flow (PF) and counter flow (CF) conditions at a solar concentration ratio (CR) of 20 suns were studied. The results showed that the header section should be considered in the numerical model for obtaining a more realistic average and local silicon layer temperature profile, especially in the CF operation. For instance, the difference in solar cell temperature between including and ignoring the header section is about 13.86 K for CF operation at CR of 20 and 200 ml/hr coolant flowrate. The predicted pumping power and net gained electric power were also significantly affected by neglecting the headers in the numerical modelling. The electrical efficiency deviation reached about 23.5% at CF, while PF reported almost 4.0%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available