4.7 Article

Dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm with objective space prediction strategy

Journal

APPLIED SOFT COMPUTING
Volume 107, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.asoc.2021.107258

Keywords

Dynamic multi-objective optimization; Evolutionary computation; Prediction-based methods; Forecast; Probabilistic modeling

Funding

  1. CAPES (Brazil)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithms can address multi-objective optimization problems by predicting and responding to changes, with prediction-based methods showing promise. Through the use of objective space prediction strategy and change reaction mechanism, the proposed DOSP-NSDE demonstrates competitiveness in experiments.
To solve dynamic multi-objective optimization problems, a dynamic multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (DMOEA) must be able to deal with the dynamics of the environment, and such modifications can lead to new optimal solutions over time. Various algorithms have been proposed that modify the way a change is handled. Among them, prediction-based methods are promising for solving this kind of problem. They provide guided direction for population evolution through a prediction mechanism that assists the DMOEA to respond quickly to new changes. Based on these strategies, we propose a dynamic non-dominated sorting differential evolution improvement with prediction in the objective space (DOSP-NSDE). The proposal uses the objective space prediction (OSP) strategy for both the static evolutionary process (between changes) and the change reaction mechanism to predict the new optimal front location. Experiments were performed on a real-world problem and four sets of test problems: FDA, dMOP, UDF, and DF. Comparison of DOSP-NSDE with several algorithms in the literature, considering three metrics, is presented, showing that the proposal is competitive with most problems. (C) 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available