4.6 Article

Dichroism and birefringence optical atomic magnetometer with or without self-generated light squeezing

Journal

APPLIED PHYSICS LETTERS
Volume 119, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/5.0054842

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key Research Program of China [2016YFA0302000, 2017YFA0304204]
  2. NNSFC [12027806, 91636107]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigates NMOR magnetometers and finds that the best sensitivity is achieved in the low power regime with no light squeezing. Insights on parameter optimization and choice of detection observables are provided, emphasizing the delicate trade-off between atomic responses and various noise sources. The results could have practical significance in optical atomic magnetometry.
An atomic magnetometer detects atomic responses to the magnetic field, and its sensitivity is ultimately limited by quantum noise fluctuations. For magnetometers based on nonlinear magneto-optical rotation (NMOR), the possible concurrent generation of light squeezing due to polarization self-rotation complicates the optimization for magnetometer sensitivity. Here, we study NMOR magnetometers with frequency-modulated light in a paraffin coated Rb-87 vapor cell in the low and high power regimes corresponding to situations with and without light squeezing, respectively, with detection observables being different Stokes components reflecting the magnetic-field-induced atomic circular dichroism or birefringence. We found that the overall best sensitivity is achieved in the low power regime when there is no light squeezing and for circular dichroism measurement. We provide a general insight on parameter optimization and the choice of detection observables, from the delicate trade-off between the atomic responses and the noises including the technical and quantum optical noises. Our results could have practical significance in optical atomic magnetometry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available