4.6 Review

Genomics advances the study of inbreeding depression in the wild

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 10, Pages 1205-1218

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12414

Keywords

conservation genetics; fitness; identity by descent; pedigree analysis; whole-genome resequencing

Funding

  1. Swedish Research Council
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  3. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-1258203]
  4. Division Of Environmental Biology
  5. Direct For Biological Sciences [1258203] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inbreeding depression (reduced fitness of individuals with related parents) has long been a major focus of ecology, evolution, and conservation biology. Despite decades of research, we still have a limited understanding of the strength, underlying genetic mechanisms, and demographic consequences of inbreeding depression in the wild. Studying inbreeding depression in natural populations has been hampered by the inability to precisely measure individual inbreeding. Fortunately, the rapidly increasing availability of high-throughput sequencing data means it is now feasible to measure the inbreeding of any individual with high precision. Here, we review how genomic data are advancing our understanding of inbreeding depression in the wild. Recent results show that individual inbreeding and inbreeding depression can be measured more precisely with genomic data than via traditional pedigree analysis. Additionally, the availability of genomic data has made it possible to pinpoint loci with large effects contributing to inbreeding depression in wild populations, although this will continue to be a challenging task in many study systems due to low statistical power. Now that reliably measuring individual inbreeding is no longer a limitation, a major focus of future studies should be to more accurately quantify effects of inbreeding depression on population growth and viability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available