4.6 Article

Describing a developing hybrid zone between red wolves and coyotes in eastern North Carolina, USA

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 6, Pages 791-804

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12388

Keywords

conservation-reliant species; endangered species; genetic cline; genetic introgression; noninvasive genetic sampling

Funding

  1. USFWS
  2. USFWS Red Wolf Recovery Team
  3. Red Wolf Recovery Implementation Team
  4. Point Defiance Zoo Conservation Committee
  5. University of Idaho Student Grant Program [U10854]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

When hybridizing species come into contact, understanding the processes that regulate their interactions can help predict the future outcome of the system. This is especially relevant in conservation situations where human activities can influence hybridization dynamics. We investigated a developing hybrid zone between red wolves and coyotes in North Carolina, USA to elucidate patterns of hybridization in a system heavily managed for preservation of the red wolf genome. Using noninvasive genetic sampling of scat, we surveyed a 2880 km 2 region adjacent to the Red Wolf Experimental Population Area (RWEPA). We combined microsatellite genotypes collected from this survey with those from companion studies conducted both within and outside the RWEPA to describe the gradient of red wolf ancestry. A total of 311 individuals were genotyped at 17 loci and red wolf ancestry decreased along an east-west gradient across the RWEPA. No red wolves were found outside the RWEPA, yet half of individuals found within this area were coyotes. Hybrids composed only 4% of individuals within this landscape despite co-occurrence of the two species throughout the RWEPA. The low proportion of hybrids suggests that a combination of active management and natural isolating mechanisms may be limiting intermixing within this hybrid system.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available