4.6 Article

Population genomics of the Anthropocene: urbanization is negatively associated with genome-wide variation in white-footed mouse populations

Journal

EVOLUTIONARY APPLICATIONS
Volume 9, Issue 4, Pages 546-564

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/eva.12357

Keywords

ddRADSeq; landscape genetics; Peromyscus; population genomics; rapid evolution; single nucleotide polymorphism; urbanization

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences of the National Institutes of Health [R15GM099055]
  2. National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urbanization results in pervasive habitat fragmentation and reduces standing genetic variation through bottlenecks and drift. Loss of genomewide variation may ultimately reduce the evolutionary potential of animal populations experiencing rapidly changing conditions. In this study, we examined genomewide variation among 23 white-footed mouse (Peromyscus leucopus) populations sampled along an urbanization gradient in the New York City metropolitan area. Genomewide variation was estimated as a proxy for evolutionary potential using more than 10000 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers generated by ddRAD-Seq. We found that genomewide variation is inversely related to urbanization as measured by percent impervious surface cover, and to a lesser extent, human population density. We also report that urbanization results in enhanced genomewide differentiation between populations in cities. There was no pattern of isolation by distance among these populations, but an isolation by resistance model based on impervious surface significantly explained patterns of genetic differentiation. Isolation by environment modeling also indicated that urban populations deviate much more strongly from global allele frequencies than suburban or rural populations. This study is the first to examine loss of genomewide SNP variation along an urban-to-rural gradient and quantify urbanization as a driver of population genomic patterns.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available