4.5 Review

The influence of using exoskeletons during occupational tasks on acute physical stress and strain compared to no exoskeleton - A systematic review and meta-analysis

Journal

APPLIED ERGONOMICS
Volume 94, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.apergo.2021.103385

Keywords

Assistive device; Biomechanics; Muscle activity; Work-related musculoskeletal disorder

Funding

  1. Baden-Wurttemberg (Sudwestmetall)
  2. AUDI AG (Ingolstadt, Germany)
  3. BMW AG (Munchen, Germany)
  4. Daimler AG (Stuttgart, Germany)
  5. Itturi GmbH (Kodln, Germany)
  6. BASF SE (Ludwigshafen am Rhein, Germany)
  7. Deutsche Post DHL Group (Bonn, Germany)
  8. MTUAero Engines AG (Munchen, Germany)
  9. DACHSER SE (Kempten, Germany)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the effects of using an exoskeleton during occupational tasks on physical stress and strain, showing that using an exoskeleton can reduce acute physical stress and strain in the exoskeleton's target area. However, the impact on workers' health is still uncertain due to lack of long-term evaluations under real working conditions.
Objectives: This systematic review and meta-analysis determined the effects of using an exoskeleton during occupational tasks on physical stress and strain compared to not using an exoskeleton. Methods: Systematic electronic database searches were performed and the review was prepared according to the PRISMA guidelines. Treatment effects on the predefined outcomes were calculated using standardized mean differences for continuous outcomes in several meta-analyses using Review Manager 5.3. Registration: PROSPERO (CRD42020168701). Results: 63 articles were included in qualitative syntheses and 52 in quantitative, but most of them did not extensively evaluate musculoskeletal stress and strain and the risk of bias was rated high for all included studies. Statistically significant effects of using back, upper-limb, or lower-limb exoskeletons have been observed in the supported body areas (e.g. reduced muscle activity, joint moments and perceived strain). Studies which did not exclusively focus on the supported body area also showed statistically significant effects in the non-supported areas (e.g. changed muscle activity and perceived strain) and in physiological outcomes (e.g. reduced energy expenditure). Conclusions: Using an exoskeleton during occupational tasks seems to reduce user's acute physical stress and strain in the exoskeleton's target area. However, impact on workers' health is still unknown, primarily because of missing long-term evaluations under real working conditions. Furthermore, this systematic review highlights a lack of studies (1) following high quality methodological criteria, (2) evaluating various inter-related stress and strain parameters instead of only focusing on one specific, and (3) evaluating non-target body areas instead of only the directly supported body area.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available